Accuracy of fossil dating methods

Some even buried their dead and painted on cave walls. Then, about 10 to 25 thousand years ago, God replaced them with Adam and Eve.” Notice that Ross states that Adam and Eve lived 10–25 thousand years ago (he realizes that he can’t push the genealogies too far).However, when the same dating methods in which he trusts said that the Australian Aborigines and American Indians lived 40–60,000 years ago, he changed the sentence in the above quote to read: “Then about 10 to 60 thousand years ago, God replaced them with Adam and Eve.” Presumably the change was made because the 25,000 year limit would mean that the Aborigines and Indians could not have been descendants of Adam and Eve.However, in doing this, Stott and his fellow-thinkers not only add something to Genesis that is not there (i.e.

accuracy of fossil dating methods-67

Such a mindset overlooks the fact that where modern science deals with origins, it is based on strict naturalism (the humanistic view that all phenomena can be explained in terms of natural, not supernatural, causes and laws).

Unfortunately compromise of this sort means having to continually change one’s position to keep up with evolutionary pronouncements.

Hence pre-Adamism took the form of , or multiple creations of different races.

Proponents of this idea often thought that non-whites were inferior beings who could be treated as slaves.

offers a variety of native and mass-labelled reference standards for legacy environmental contaminants such as polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).